GECC vs PNNT: Which BDC is the Better Dividend Buy?

A side-by-side comparison of Great Elm Capital Corp. (GECC) and PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) — dividend yield, NAV premium/discount, market cap, and price-to-NAV valuation.

GECC
Great Elm Capital Corp.
NASDAQ Quarterly Div
PNNT
PennantPark Investment Corporation
NASDAQ Quarterly Div

Ready to Trade GECC or PNNT?

Public Disclosure: We maintain material affiliate partnerships with the trading platforms listed below and may receive compensation if you open an account through our tracking routes.

Compare BDC dividend yields side-by-side, then open a brokerage account that supports fractional shares and real-time distribution tracking.

eToro ★ Best for Commission-Free Fractional BDC Shares
Trade GECC or PNNT on eToro →
Interactive Brokers (IBKR) ★ Best for Advanced Yield & Asset Coverage Analysis
Invest in GECC / PNNT via IBKR →

GECC vs PNNT: Key Metrics Head-to-Head

MetricGECCPNNTEdge
Dividend Yield24.16%28.66%PNNT
Premium / Discount to NAV-55.87%-52.82%PNNT
Market Capitalization$0.08B$0.3BPNNT
Trailing Stock Price$5.34$3.35
Net Asset Value (NAV)$12.1$7.1
Price vs NAV (Valuation)DiscountDiscountPNNT
Dividend FrequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
Leverage Ratio1.28x1.26xPNNT

About GECC — Great Elm Capital Corp.

Great Elm Capital Corp. is an externally managed BDC focused on investing in senior secured and mezzanine debt of middle-market companies. GECC seeks to generate current income with a portfolio that includes senior secured loans, mezzanine instruments, and selected unsecured debt positions. The BDC is externally managed by Great Elm Capital Management and targets borrowers with EBITDA between $3 million and $25 million.

View Full GECC Profile →

About PNNT — PennantPark Investment Corporation

PennantPark Investment Corporation is a BDC that originates and acquires senior secured loans, mezzanine debt, and equity investments in middle-market companies. PNNT, the predecessor vehicle to PFLT, retains a diversified portfolio that includes second lien loans, subordinated debt, and selected equity co-investments. The BDC is externally managed by PennantPark Investment Advisers and targets companies with EBITDA between $5 million and $25 million.

View Full PNNT Profile →

How to Choose Between GECC and PNNT

When comparing two Business Development Companies, the right choice depends on your income objective:

  • Dividend yield matters most for immediate income — the higher yielder wins on cash flow, but make sure it's covered by investment income.
  • NAV premium/discount matters for valuation — a discount to NAV implies you're buying assets below their accounting value, a premium implies the market expects above-average growth.
  • Market cap reflects liquidity and scale — larger BDCs typically have lower borrowing costs and better portfolio diversification.
  • Leverage cuts both ways — it amplifies dividend yield but increases sensitivity to credit defaults and interest rate moves.

Both GECC and PNNT are Regulated Investment Company (RIC)-structured BDCs required to distribute at least 90% of taxable income to shareholders, which is what produces their above-average dividend yields. Use the comparison table above as a starting point, then read each full profile before making an investment decision.

Affiliate Disclosure: BusinessDevelopmentCompanies.com participates in affiliate marketing programs. We may earn a commission or referral fee when visitors click links to institutional partner platforms like eToro or Interactive Brokers. This financial support enables us to maintain real-time programmatic valuation data across our platform. Links to brokerages on this page carry the rel="sponsored nofollow noopener" attribute.

Not Investment Advice: This comparison is for educational and informational purposes only. Nothing here constitutes a recommendation, solicitation, or investment advice to buy or sell any security. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own due diligence and consult a licensed financial advisor. Read our full Editorial Policy and Terms of Service.