FDUS vs NCDL: Which BDC is the Better Dividend Buy?

A side-by-side comparison of Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS) and Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending Corp. (NCDL) — dividend yield, NAV premium/discount, market cap, and price-to-NAV valuation.

FDUS
Fidus Investment Corporation
NASDAQ Quarterly Div
NCDL
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending Corp.
NYSE Quarterly Div

Ready to Trade FDUS or NCDL?

Public Disclosure: We maintain material affiliate partnerships with the trading platforms listed below and may receive compensation if you open an account through our tracking routes.

Compare BDC dividend yields side-by-side, then open a brokerage account that supports fractional shares and real-time distribution tracking.

eToro ★ Best for Commission-Free Fractional BDC Shares
Trade FDUS or NCDL on eToro →
Interactive Brokers (IBKR) ★ Best for Advanced Yield & Asset Coverage Analysis
Invest in FDUS / NCDL via IBKR →

FDUS vs NCDL: Key Metrics Head-to-Head

MetricFDUSNCDLEdge
Dividend Yield10.85%13.24%NCDL
Premium / Discount to NAV3.88%-27.49%FDUS
Market Capitalization$0.75B$0.51BFDUS
Trailing Stock Price$20.36$12.69
Net Asset Value (NAV)$19.6$17.5
Price vs NAV (Valuation)PremiumDiscountFDUS
Dividend FrequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
Leverage Ratio1.22x1.2xNCDL

About FDUS — Fidus Investment Corporation

Fidus Investment Corporation is a BDC that provides customized debt and equity financing to lower middle-market companies. FDUS focuses on businesses with EBITDA between $3 million and $25 million, offering senior secured loans, mezzanine debt, and equity co-investments. The company is internally managed and has a strong track record of supplemental dividends above its regular quarterly distributions.

View Full FDUS Profile →

About NCDL — Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending Corp.

Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending Corp. is an externally managed BDC structured as a joint venture between Nuveen and Churchill Asset Management. NCDL provides senior secured and unitranche loans to U.S. middle-market companies backed by private equity sponsors. The portfolio comprises predominantly floating-rate first lien loans sourced through Churchills direct origination network, targeting borrowers with EBITDA between $5 million and $50 million.

View Full NCDL Profile →

How to Choose Between FDUS and NCDL

When comparing two Business Development Companies, the right choice depends on your income objective:

  • Dividend yield matters most for immediate income — the higher yielder wins on cash flow, but make sure it's covered by investment income.
  • NAV premium/discount matters for valuation — a discount to NAV implies you're buying assets below their accounting value, a premium implies the market expects above-average growth.
  • Market cap reflects liquidity and scale — larger BDCs typically have lower borrowing costs and better portfolio diversification.
  • Leverage cuts both ways — it amplifies dividend yield but increases sensitivity to credit defaults and interest rate moves.

Both FDUS and NCDL are Regulated Investment Company (RIC)-structured BDCs required to distribute at least 90% of taxable income to shareholders, which is what produces their above-average dividend yields. Use the comparison table above as a starting point, then read each full profile before making an investment decision.

Affiliate Disclosure: BusinessDevelopmentCompanies.com participates in affiliate marketing programs. We may earn a commission or referral fee when visitors click links to institutional partner platforms like eToro or Interactive Brokers. This financial support enables us to maintain real-time programmatic valuation data across our platform. Links to brokerages on this page carry the rel="sponsored nofollow noopener" attribute.

Not Investment Advice: This comparison is for educational and informational purposes only. Nothing here constitutes a recommendation, solicitation, or investment advice to buy or sell any security. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own due diligence and consult a licensed financial advisor. Read our full Editorial Policy and Terms of Service.