MFIC vs PFLT: Which BDC is the Better Dividend Buy?

A side-by-side comparison of MidCap Financial Investment Corporation (MFIC) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) — dividend yield, NAV premium/discount, market cap, and price-to-NAV valuation.

MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment Corporation
NASDAQ Quarterly Div
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
NASDAQ Quarterly Div

Ready to Trade MFIC or PFLT?

Public Disclosure: We maintain material affiliate partnerships with the trading platforms listed below and may receive compensation if you open an account through our tracking routes.

Compare BDC dividend yields side-by-side, then open a brokerage account that supports fractional shares and real-time distribution tracking.

eToro ★ Best for Commission-Free Fractional BDC Shares
Trade MFIC or PFLT on eToro →
Interactive Brokers (IBKR) ★ Best for Advanced Yield & Asset Coverage Analysis
Invest in MFIC / PFLT via IBKR →

MFIC vs PFLT: Key Metrics Head-to-Head

MetricMFICPFLTEdge
Dividend Yield14.11%16.5%PFLT
Premium / Discount to NAV-34.8%-26.77%PFLT
Market Capitalization$0.42B$0.45BPFLT
Trailing Stock Price$9.78$7.25
Net Asset Value (NAV)$15$9.9
Price vs NAV (Valuation)DiscountDiscountPFLT
Dividend FrequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
Leverage Ratio1.22x1.2xPFLT

About MFIC — MidCap Financial Investment Corporation

MidCap Financial Investment Corporation is an externally managed BDC advised by MidCap Financial Services, focused on senior secured first lien and mezzanine debt to U.S. middle-market companies. MFIC targets borrowers with EBITDA between $5 million and $50 million with an emphasis on floating-rate loan structures. The portfolio spans healthcare, business services, and technology sectors with an asset-based focus on senior secured loans.

View Full MFIC Profile →

About PFLT — PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is an externally managed BDC advised by PennantPark Investment Advisers, focused on floating-rate senior secured loans to U.S. middle-market companies. PFLT is designed for an interest-rate-sensitive environment, with a portfolio of predominantly first lien floating-rate instruments that reset with benchmark rates. The BDC targets companies with EBITDA between $5 million and $25 million.

View Full PFLT Profile →

How to Choose Between MFIC and PFLT

When comparing two Business Development Companies, the right choice depends on your income objective:

  • Dividend yield matters most for immediate income — the higher yielder wins on cash flow, but make sure it's covered by investment income.
  • NAV premium/discount matters for valuation — a discount to NAV implies you're buying assets below their accounting value, a premium implies the market expects above-average growth.
  • Market cap reflects liquidity and scale — larger BDCs typically have lower borrowing costs and better portfolio diversification.
  • Leverage cuts both ways — it amplifies dividend yield but increases sensitivity to credit defaults and interest rate moves.

Both MFIC and PFLT are Regulated Investment Company (RIC)-structured BDCs required to distribute at least 90% of taxable income to shareholders, which is what produces their above-average dividend yields. Use the comparison table above as a starting point, then read each full profile before making an investment decision.

Affiliate Disclosure: BusinessDevelopmentCompanies.com participates in affiliate marketing programs. We may earn a commission or referral fee when visitors click links to institutional partner platforms like eToro or Interactive Brokers. This financial support enables us to maintain real-time programmatic valuation data across our platform. Links to brokerages on this page carry the rel="sponsored nofollow noopener" attribute.

Not Investment Advice: This comparison is for educational and informational purposes only. Nothing here constitutes a recommendation, solicitation, or investment advice to buy or sell any security. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own due diligence and consult a licensed financial advisor. Read our full Editorial Policy and Terms of Service.