FSK vs OXSQ: Which BDC is the Better Dividend Buy?

A side-by-side comparison of FS KKR Capital Corp. II (FSK) and Oxford Square Capital Corp. (OXSQ) — dividend yield, NAV premium/discount, market cap, and price-to-NAV valuation.

FSK
FS KKR Capital Corp. II
NYSE Quarterly Div
OXSQ
Oxford Square Capital Corp.
NASDAQ Quarterly Div

Ready to Trade FSK or OXSQ?

Public Disclosure: We maintain material affiliate partnerships with the trading platforms listed below and may receive compensation if you open an account through our tracking routes.

Compare BDC dividend yields side-by-side, then open a brokerage account that supports fractional shares and real-time distribution tracking.

eToro ★ Best for Commission-Free Fractional BDC Shares
Trade FSK or OXSQ on eToro →
Interactive Brokers (IBKR) ★ Best for Advanced Yield & Asset Coverage Analysis
Invest in FSK / OXSQ via IBKR →

FSK vs OXSQ: Key Metrics Head-to-Head

MetricFSKOXSQEdge
Dividend Yield21.04%28.77%OXSQ
Premium / Discount to NAV-11.14%-39.17%FSK
Market Capitalization$2.6B$0.08BFSK
Trailing Stock Price$10.93$1.46
Net Asset Value (NAV)$12.3$2.4
Price vs NAV (Valuation)DiscountDiscountFSK
Dividend FrequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
Leverage Ratio1.18x1.35xFSK

About FSK — FS KKR Capital Corp. II

FS KKR Capital Corp. II is one of the largest externally managed BDCs in the United States, formed by the merger of four non-traded FS Investment Corporation vehicles. FSK is co-managed by FS Investments and KKR Credit, providing senior secured debt, subordinated debt, and selected equity investments to U.S. middle-market companies. The portfolio is diversified across roughly 150 issuers and emphasizes first lien senior secured loans as the core credit exposure.

View Full FSK Profile →

About OXSQ — Oxford Square Capital Corp.

Oxford Square Capital Corp. is an externally managed BDC that invests primarily in senior secured loans and CLO equity and debt tranches. OXSQ is unusual among BDCs in its significant allocation to CLO securities, which can introduce correlation risk with broader credit cycles. The company is externally managed by Oxford Square Management and targets a high current yield through its income-focused portfolio strategy.

View Full OXSQ Profile →

How to Choose Between FSK and OXSQ

When comparing two Business Development Companies, the right choice depends on your income objective:

  • Dividend yield matters most for immediate income — the higher yielder wins on cash flow, but make sure it's covered by investment income.
  • NAV premium/discount matters for valuation — a discount to NAV implies you're buying assets below their accounting value, a premium implies the market expects above-average growth.
  • Market cap reflects liquidity and scale — larger BDCs typically have lower borrowing costs and better portfolio diversification.
  • Leverage cuts both ways — it amplifies dividend yield but increases sensitivity to credit defaults and interest rate moves.

Both FSK and OXSQ are Regulated Investment Company (RIC)-structured BDCs required to distribute at least 90% of taxable income to shareholders, which is what produces their above-average dividend yields. Use the comparison table above as a starting point, then read each full profile before making an investment decision.

Affiliate Disclosure: BusinessDevelopmentCompanies.com participates in affiliate marketing programs. We may earn a commission or referral fee when visitors click links to institutional partner platforms like eToro or Interactive Brokers. This financial support enables us to maintain real-time programmatic valuation data across our platform. Links to brokerages on this page carry the rel="sponsored nofollow noopener" attribute.

Not Investment Advice: This comparison is for educational and informational purposes only. Nothing here constitutes a recommendation, solicitation, or investment advice to buy or sell any security. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own due diligence and consult a licensed financial advisor. Read our full Editorial Policy and Terms of Service.